A Test of What, Exactly? by Sophie Browner

For the past two years, the ACT has been consuming my life. It used to be a minor inconvenience, just three hours taken out of my Saturday to sit at an uncomfortable desk and take an extensive test. The first time that I took it I went in feeling fairly confident; my grades were solid and I thought it would be a one time thing. However, I did not realize how the process would start to alter my school life, home life, and the perception I have of myself. My score arrived two weeks later and I was utterly shaken. I knew that I hadn’t given it too much thought, but my score completely caught me off guard. I am not usually one to let a number or grade define me, but for some reason this felt different. I wish that I could lie and say the whole thing was a breeze, but I truly believe that many people, like me, are not natural test takers, and go through similar experiences. So I worked. Hard. I worked and studied and worked some more, just to raise a number that I was letting get me down. Is it wrong to put so much time and effort into something that you despise? Is it wrong to put no time or effort into something that will probably help you in the long run? I don’t know. As much as I would like to rebel against this unfair social norm, I know that I genuinely care too much.

I realize that I am writing this article from a position of privilege. I have a tutor, a TI-84 calculator, and an array of colored pens that help me study. But I believe that it is important to bring the real issues surrounding standardized testing out in the open. 

To me, it makes absolutely no sense to have the majority of high school students from all different learning styles, economic backgrounds, and education levels walk into the same room, sit down, and take the exact same test. I am writing this as an ode to the people who struggle.  It does not mean we are not smart. We are smart, capable people. I am working to change my mindset. I am not going to let a score define how I see myself, and neither should you.

Which Came First: The Movie or the Book? by Caitlin Cullina

   For most of my life I have stood by the philosophy that one should read a book before watching any television or movie adaptations of it. Reading is such an individual and creative experience, and watching cinematic interpretations seems to distort that. When I read, I can imagine the scenes and the characters in my own way, giving the story a personal touch. However, if I watch the actors performing the scenes, their faces become the ones I imagine when I hear a character’s name. I believe it truly warps my own image of the details of novels, to a point of no return. The interpretation is no longer my own; it is that of the director or the person who cast the film.
    Additionally, I find that books tell the truest form of the plot. It is usually the way the author originally wanted the story, with every scene and aspect laid out. Nothing was removed in order to shorten a run time or altered to appease a cable company.
    Take, for example, Harry Potter. Reading this post did you just think of Daniel Radcliffe? Is he, in your mind, Harry Potter?  Or did you have your own picture of Harry in your head? And did it make a difference if you read the book first? Personally I thought of Daniel Radcliffe because I was too young to have tackled one of the Harry Potter books when I initially saw one of the movies. I definitely believe that it changed my perspective. Daniel Radcliffe and Harry Potter can’t be separated in my head.
    Now, I don’t always realize that a film or television show was a book first, but I still like to go back and read the book afterwards. I like to compare the mediums and I encourage others to do the same. Even if I do have the chance to experience the story as text first, seeing it on-screen still alters my vision of the novel. But I still had that intimate, authentic understanding of story and I think that’s really meaningful.